Does this guarantee legal compliance?
No. This is a technical review and remediation service, not legal advice or a blanket compliance certification. The deliverable states the testing scope and findings.
People use websites with keyboards, screen readers, magnification, and many different devices. I review the agreed pages and interactions for accessibility barriers, then help make the content and controls easier to use.
An accessibility review needs more than an automated score. The scope can combine automated checks with manual keyboard, focus, form, and screen-reader checks. Findings are tied to specific components and an agreed WCAG target so the work is clear and reviewable.
Agree on representative pages, important tasks, testing methods, and the standard used for the review.
Review navigation, visible focus, labels, instructions, and error handling.
Address agreed issues with structure, contrast, text alternatives, and readable layouts.
Document findings, implement the agreed fixes, and check the affected interactions again.
We define the pages, user journeys, and testing scope first. I document barriers and prioritize them with you, then quote or carry out the agreed remediation. The handoff explains what was tested, what was fixed, and any remaining limitations.
We agree on the scope, deliverables, and total before work begins. The quote identifies any third-party costs and ongoing support separately.
No. This is a technical review and remediation service, not legal advice or a blanket compliance certification. The deliverable states the testing scope and findings.
A widget does not replace reviewing and fixing the underlying content, markup, and interactions. This service focuses on those underlying barriers.
New content and features can introduce new issues. We can define follow-up checks and practical content guidance as part of ongoing support.
Tell me what you want to improve and what you already have. I’ll help define a practical next step.